Replace the stale Python-first README narrative, old community links, and leftover branded metadata with the current Rust-first repo guidance. Also align funding handles and asset naming so the public docs point at the canonical ultraworkers/claw-code surface.\n\nConstraint: Scope limited to docs/metadata and branding residue; no runtime behavior changes\nRejected: Add a new CI lint in this pass | outside the requested docs-and-config cleanup scope\nConfidence: medium\nScope-risk: narrow\nReversibility: clean\nDirective: Keep README, funding metadata, and community links aligned with ultraworkers/claw-code and the current UltraWorkers Discord invite\nTested: stale-branding grep across markdown/.github; root doc-link existence checks; cargo fmt --all --check; cargo check --workspace; cargo test --workspace\nNot-tested: cargo clippy --workspace --all-targets -- -D warnings | fails on pre-existing runtime lint debt unrelated to these doc changes
The root and Rust-facing docs now point readers at a single task-oriented usage guide with build, auth, CLI, session, and parity-harness examples. This also fixes stale workspace references and updates the Rust workspace inventory to match the current crate set.
Constraint: Existing README copy still referenced the old dev/rust status and needed to stay lightweight
Rejected: Fold all usage details into README.md only | too much noise for the landing page
Confidence: high
Scope-risk: narrow
Reversibility: clean
Directive: Keep USAGE examples aligned with when CLI flags change
Tested: cargo build --workspace; cargo test --workspace
Not-tested: External links and rendered Markdown in GitHub UI
The old tracked TypeScript snapshot has been removed from the repository history and the root directory is now a Python porting workspace. README and tests now describe and verify the Python-first layout instead of treating the exposed snapshot as the active source tree.
A local archive can still exist outside Git, but the tracked repository now presents only the Python porting surface, related essay context, and OmX workflow artifacts.
Constraint: Tracked history should collapse to a single commit while excluding the archived snapshot from Git
Rejected: Keep the exposed TypeScript tree in tracked history under an archive path | user explicitly wanted only the Python porting repo state in Git
Confidence: medium
Scope-risk: broad
Reversibility: messy
Directive: Keep future tracked additions focused on the Python port itself; do not reintroduce the exposed snapshot into Git history
Tested: python3 -m unittest discover -s tests -v; python3 -m src.main summary; git diff --check
Not-tested: Behavioral parity with the original TypeScript system beyond the current Python workspace surface
